Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Fuel Economy In Automobiles shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Fuel Economy In Automobiles offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Fuel Economy In Automobiles at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Fuel Economy In Automobiles? Wrong! If the Fuel Economy In Automobiles is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about Fuel Economy In Automobiles then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Fuel Economy In Automobiles? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Fuel Economy In Automobiles and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Fuel Economy In Automobiles wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your Fuel Economy In Automobiles then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Fuel Economy In Automobiles site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about Fuel Economy In Automobiles, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your Fuel Economy In Automobiles, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.

Fuel economy in automobiles is the amount of fuel required to move the automobile over a given distance. While the fuel efficiency of petroleum internal combustion engine has improved markedly in recent decades, this does not necessarily translate into fuel economy of cars, as people in developed countries tend to buy bigger and heavier cars.

Units of measure The two most common ways to measure automobile fuel economy are:

The amount of fuel used per unit distance; most commonly, litres per 100 kilometres (L/100km). Lower values mean better fuel economy: you use less fuel to travel the same distance.

The distance travelled per unit of fuel used; most commonly, kilometers per litre (km/L) or miles per gallon (mpg). Higher values mean better fuel economy: you can travel farther for the same amount of fuel.

To convert between L/(100 km) and miles per U.S. customary units#Liquid volume, divide 235 by the number in question. (For miles per Imperial units#Measures of volume, use 282 instead of 235.) For example, to convert from 30 mpg (U.S.) to L/(100 km), divide 235 by 30, giving 7.83 L/(100 km).

A related measure is the amount of carbon dioxide produced as a result of the combustion process, typically measured in grams of CO2 per kilometer (CO2 g/km). A petrol (gasoline) engine will produce around 2.3 kg of carbon dioxide for each litre of petrol consumed (19 lb/gal). http://www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/inter.nsf/WebPages/MCLE-5WV8R7?open A typical diesel engine produces 2.8 kg/L (23 lb/gal)http://timeforchange.org/what-is-a-carbon-footprint-definition though typically burns fewer litres per kilometer (and is thus typically more fuel efficient for an otherwise identical car). Since the CO2 emissions are relatively constant per gallon, fuel efficiency is directly related to emissions of CO2 per mile.

Fuel economy statistics The choice of car and how it is driven drastically affects the fuel economy. A top fuel dragster can consume 6 gallon (23 L) of gasoline (petrol) for a quarter-mile (400 metre) run in about 4.5 seconds, which comes out to 24 gallons per mile (5600 L per 100 km). The other extreme was set in 2003 by Microjoule, a team from France entered in the Shell Eco-Marathon, who set a world record of 25 millilitre per 100 km (9,400 mpg (U.S.) or 11,300 mpg (imperial)) at an average speed of 15 miles per hour (24 km/h).

Both such vehicles are extremes, and most people drive ordinary cars that typically average 15 to 40 miles per gallon (15 to 5.6 L per 100 km). However, due to environmental concerns caused by CO2 emissions, new European Union regulations are being introduced to reduce the average emissions, of cars sold beginning in 2010 to 2012, to 120 g/km of CO2, equivalent to 4.5 L per 100 km (52 mpg) for a diesel-fueled car, and 5.0 L per 100 km (47 mpg) for a gasoline (petrol)-fueled car. European strategy targets car emissions EU fuel economy testing is done on a dynamometer with two segments, ECE15 and EUDC, which correspond to city and highway driving, respectively. The city driving cycle simulates a 4.052 km (2.5 mile) urban trip at an average speed of 18.7 km/h (11.6 mph) and at a maximum speed of 50 km/h (31 mph), while the highway cycle lasts 400 seconds (6 minutes 40 seconds) at an average speed 62.6 km/h (39 mph) and a top speed of 120 km/h (74.6 mph). Vehicle test cycles

The power to overcome air resistance increases roughly with the cube of the speed. Thus, above about 30 mph (48 km/h), Drag (physics) becomes a dominant limiting factor. By driving at 45 rather than 65 mph (72 rather than 105 km/h), the power to overcome wind resistance is about one-third, and much greater fuel economy can be achieved. Increasing speed to 90 mph (145 km/h) increases the power requirement by 2.6 times, and drastically decreases fuel economy. In practice, rather than doubling or halving the fuel economy, the difference is actually closer to 40-50%, since rolling resistance, which is broadly proportional to speed, is also a factor.

USA: Government regulations U.S. Energy Tax Act The Energy Tax Act of 1978 http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/info.shtml#guzzler in the U.S. established a gas guzzler tax on the sale of new model year vehicles whose fuel economy fails to meet certain statutory levels. The tax applies only to cars (not trucks) and is collected by the Internal Revenue Service. Its purpose is to discourage the production and purchase of fuel-inefficient vehicles. The tax was phased in over ten years with rates increasing over time. It applies only to manufacturers and importers of vehicles, although presumably some or all of the tax is passed along to automobile consumers in the form of higher prices. Only new vehicles are subject to the tax, so no tax is imposed on used car sales. The tax is graduated to apply a higher tax rate for less-fuel-efficient vehicles. To determine the tax rate, manufacturers test all the vehicles at their laboratories for fuel economy. The U.S. United States Environmental Protection Agency confirms a portion of those tests at an EPA lab.

Current EPA testing procedure through 2007 Two separate fuel economy tests simulate city driving and highway driving: the city driving program consists of starting with a cold engine and making 23 stops over a period of 31 minutes for an average speed of 20 mph (32 km/h) and with a top speed of 56 mph (90 km/h); the highway program uses a warmed-up engine and makes no stops, averaging 48 mph (77 km/h) with a top speed of 60 mph (97 km/h) over a 10 mile (16 km) distance. The measurements are then adjusted downward by 10% (city) and 22% (highway) to more accurately reflect real-world results. A weight average of city (55%) and highway (45%) fuel economies is used to determine the tax. How the EPA Tests and Rates Fuel Economy

In some cases, this tax may only apply to certain variants of a given model - for example, the 2004–2006 Pontiac GTO#Revival did incur the tax when ordered with the four-speed automatic transmission, but did not incur the tax when ordered with the six-speed manual transmission.

New 2008- EPA testing procedure As a means of reflecting real world fuel economy more accurately, the EPA adds three new tests Earthcars: EPA fuel economy ratings - what's coming in 2008 that will combine with the current city and highway cycles to determine fuel economy of new vehicles, beginning with the 2008 model year. A high speed/quick acceleration loops lasts 10 minutes, covers 8 miles, averages 48 mph and reaches a top speed of 80 mph. Four stops are included, and brisk acceleration maximizes at a rate of 8.46 mph per second. The engine begins warm and air conditioning is not used. Ambient temperature varies between 68 to 86 degrees Fahrenheit.

The air conditioning test raises ambient temperatures to 95 degrees Fahrenheit, and the vehicle's climate control system is put to use. Lasting 9.9 minutes, the 3.6 mile loop averages 22 mph and maximizes at a rate of 54.8 mph. Five stops are included, idling occurs 19 percent of the time and acceleration of 5.1 mph/sec is achieved. Engine temperatures begin warm. Lastly, a cold temperature cycle uses the same parameters as the current city loop, except that ambient temperature is set to 20 degrees Fahrenheit.

CAFE standards The Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations in the United States, first enacted by Congress in 1975, are federal regulations intended to improve the average fuel economy of cars and light trucks (trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles) sold in the US in the wake of the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo. Historically, it is the sales-weighted average fuel economy of a manufacturer's Fleet vehicle of current model year passenger cars or light trucks, manufactured for sale in the United States. Under Truck CAFE standards 2008–2011 this changes to a "footprint" model where larger trucks are allowed to consume more fuel. The standards are limited to vehicles under a certain weight, but those weight classes will be expanding in 2011 if current law (as of April 2006) holds.

Energy considerations Ideally, a car traveling at a constant velocity and constant grade in a vacuum with frictionless wheels could travel at any speed without consuming any energy beyond what is needed to get the car up to speed. With ideal regenerative braking, this energy could be completely recovered. In real-world conditions, energy is lost in a number of ways:

• Engine efficiency, which varies with engine type, the mass of the automobile and its load, and engine speed (usually measured in Revolutions per minute).
• Aerodynamic drag, which increases roughly by the square of the car's speed.
• Rolling friction.
• Braking, although regenerative braking captures some of the energy that would otherwise be lost.
• Losses in the Transmission (mechanics). (Manual transmissions can be up to 94% efficient whereas older automatic transmissions may be as low as 70% efficient.http://www.sae.org/servlets/productDetail?PROD_TYP=PAPER&PROD_CD=1999-01-1259)
• Air conditioning. Parasitic losses due to the necessary power required for the engine to turn the compressor additionally decrease fuel mileage, though only when in use. Headlights, media systems, and other electronics can also increase fuel consumption, as the energy to power these devices comes from the charging system, increasing the load on the alternator.

Fuel economy-boosting technologies

• Reducing vehicle weight by using materials such as aluminum, fiberglass, plastic, HSLA steel and carbon fiber instead of steel and iron
• Designing the exterior of the vehicle to reduce aerodynamic Drag (physics)
• Using lower-viscosity lubricants (motor oil, transmission fluid, axle fluid)
• Incorporating Torque converter#Lock-up torque converters in automatic transmissions to reduce slip and power losses in the converter
• Augmenting a downsized engine with an electric drive system and battery (hybrid vehicles) hybrid electric vehicle

• Automatically shutting off engine when vehicle is stopped (Mild Hybrid)
• Recapturing wasted energy while braking (regenerative braking)
• Optimizing other engine combustion strategies:
• Stratified charge engine combustion
• Lean burn combustion
• HCCI combustion
• Variable valve timing
• Supercharger or Twincharger (when coupled with a downsized engine)

Aftermarket fuel economy device exist which are purported to increase fuel economy; many of these claims have been discredited.

Fuel economy data reliability The mandatory publication of the fuel consumption by the manufacturer has led to a doubtful practice to reach better values. Those consist of measure the users may imitate but others which are dangerous if used in road traffic or may increase maintenance costs. The measures in detail:

• selection of high quality vehicles from the production
• use of special expensive lubricants
• increase tire pressure above feasible thresholds
• disable energy consumers and start with a loaded battery
• turn the outer mirror(s) in-line with the wind
• correct the alignment of the wheels

If the test is on a test stand, the vehicle may detect open doors and adapt the engine control. Also when driven according to the test regime, the parameters may adapt automatically.This is summarized under the term "golden car" which is used to produce better mileage figures.

Fuel economy maximizing behaviors Governments, various environmentalist organizations, and companies like Toyota and Shell Oil Company have historically urged customers and citizens to maintain adequate air pressure in tires and careful acceleration/deceleration habits. These concepts are marketing through the use of terms like hypermiler, ecodriving, and Nempimania.

References

See also

• ACEA agreement
• Car_tuning
• Battery electric vehicle
• Emission standard
• Energy conservation
• Fuel_economy-maximizing_behaviors
• Fuel efficiency in transportation
• Vehicle Efficiency Initiative

External links

• U.S. Fuel Economy Label (EPA).
• US EPA Green Vehicle Guide.
• How EPA Fuel-Economy Testing Works
• US government's FuelEconomy.gov
• Canadian Energuide: Vehicles
• Green Vehicle Guide Australia
• UK Car Fuel Data
• European Community Directive 93/116/EC — European Commission Directive 93/116/EC of 17.12.1993 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 80/1268/EEC relating to the fuel consumption of motor vehicles
• Earthcars: EPA fuel economy ratings - what's coming in 2008

Fuel economy in automobiles is the amount of fuel required to move the automobile over a given distance. While the fuel efficiency of petroleum internal combustion engine has improved markedly in recent decades, this does not necessarily translate into fuel economy of cars, as people in developed countries tend to buy bigger and heavier cars.

Units of measure The two most common ways to measure automobile fuel economy are:

The amount of fuel used per unit distance; most commonly, litres per 100 kilometres (L/100km). Lower values mean better fuel economy: you use less fuel to travel the same distance.

The distance travelled per unit of fuel used; most commonly, kilometers per litre (km/L) or miles per gallon (mpg). Higher values mean better fuel economy: you can travel farther for the same amount of fuel.

To convert between L/(100 km) and miles per U.S. customary units#Liquid volume, divide 235 by the number in question. (For miles per Imperial units#Measures of volume, use 282 instead of 235.) For example, to convert from 30 mpg (U.S.) to L/(100 km), divide 235 by 30, giving 7.83 L/(100 km).

A related measure is the amount of carbon dioxide produced as a result of the combustion process, typically measured in grams of CO2 per kilometer (CO2 g/km). A petrol (gasoline) engine will produce around 2.3 kg of carbon dioxide for each litre of petrol consumed (19 lb/gal). http://www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/inter.nsf/WebPages/MCLE-5WV8R7?open A typical diesel engine produces 2.8 kg/L (23 lb/gal)http://timeforchange.org/what-is-a-carbon-footprint-definition though typically burns fewer litres per kilometer (and is thus typically more fuel efficient for an otherwise identical car). Since the CO2 emissions are relatively constant per gallon, fuel efficiency is directly related to emissions of CO2 per mile.

Fuel economy statistics The choice of car and how it is driven drastically affects the fuel economy. A top fuel dragster can consume 6 gallon (23 L) of gasoline (petrol) for a quarter-mile (400 metre) run in about 4.5 seconds, which comes out to 24 gallons per mile (5600 L per 100 km). The other extreme was set in 2003 by Microjoule, a team from France entered in the Shell Eco-Marathon, who set a world record of 25 millilitre per 100 km (9,400 mpg (U.S.) or 11,300 mpg (imperial)) at an average speed of 15 miles per hour (24 km/h).

Both such vehicles are extremes, and most people drive ordinary cars that typically average 15 to 40 miles per gallon (15 to 5.6 L per 100 km). However, due to environmental concerns caused by CO2 emissions, new European Union regulations are being introduced to reduce the average emissions, of cars sold beginning in 2010 to 2012, to 120 g/km of CO2, equivalent to 4.5 L per 100 km (52 mpg) for a diesel-fueled car, and 5.0 L per 100 km (47 mpg) for a gasoline (petrol)-fueled car. European strategy targets car emissions EU fuel economy testing is done on a dynamometer with two segments, ECE15 and EUDC, which correspond to city and highway driving, respectively. The city driving cycle simulates a 4.052 km (2.5 mile) urban trip at an average speed of 18.7 km/h (11.6 mph) and at a maximum speed of 50 km/h (31 mph), while the highway cycle lasts 400 seconds (6 minutes 40 seconds) at an average speed 62.6 km/h (39 mph) and a top speed of 120 km/h (74.6 mph). Vehicle test cycles

The power to overcome air resistance increases roughly with the cube of the speed. Thus, above about 30 mph (48 km/h), Drag (physics) becomes a dominant limiting factor. By driving at 45 rather than 65 mph (72 rather than 105 km/h), the power to overcome wind resistance is about one-third, and much greater fuel economy can be achieved. Increasing speed to 90 mph (145 km/h) increases the power requirement by 2.6 times, and drastically decreases fuel economy. In practice, rather than doubling or halving the fuel economy, the difference is actually closer to 40-50%, since rolling resistance, which is broadly proportional to speed, is also a factor.

USA: Government regulations U.S. Energy Tax Act The Energy Tax Act of 1978 http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/info.shtml#guzzler in the U.S. established a gas guzzler tax on the sale of new model year vehicles whose fuel economy fails to meet certain statutory levels. The tax applies only to cars (not trucks) and is collected by the Internal Revenue Service. Its purpose is to discourage the production and purchase of fuel-inefficient vehicles. The tax was phased in over ten years with rates increasing over time. It applies only to manufacturers and importers of vehicles, although presumably some or all of the tax is passed along to automobile consumers in the form of higher prices. Only new vehicles are subject to the tax, so no tax is imposed on used car sales. The tax is graduated to apply a higher tax rate for less-fuel-efficient vehicles. To determine the tax rate, manufacturers test all the vehicles at their laboratories for fuel economy. The U.S. United States Environmental Protection Agency confirms a portion of those tests at an EPA lab.

Current EPA testing procedure through 2007 Two separate fuel economy tests simulate city driving and highway driving: the city driving program consists of starting with a cold engine and making 23 stops over a period of 31 minutes for an average speed of 20 mph (32 km/h) and with a top speed of 56 mph (90 km/h); the highway program uses a warmed-up engine and makes no stops, averaging 48 mph (77 km/h) with a top speed of 60 mph (97 km/h) over a 10 mile (16 km) distance. The measurements are then adjusted downward by 10% (city) and 22% (highway) to more accurately reflect real-world results. A weight average of city (55%) and highway (45%) fuel economies is used to determine the tax. How the EPA Tests and Rates Fuel Economy

In some cases, this tax may only apply to certain variants of a given model - for example, the 2004–2006 Pontiac GTO#Revival did incur the tax when ordered with the four-speed automatic transmission, but did not incur the tax when ordered with the six-speed manual transmission.

New 2008- EPA testing procedure As a means of reflecting real world fuel economy more accurately, the EPA adds three new tests Earthcars: EPA fuel economy ratings - what's coming in 2008 that will combine with the current city and highway cycles to determine fuel economy of new vehicles, beginning with the 2008 model year. A high speed/quick acceleration loops lasts 10 minutes, covers 8 miles, averages 48 mph and reaches a top speed of 80 mph. Four stops are included, and brisk acceleration maximizes at a rate of 8.46 mph per second. The engine begins warm and air conditioning is not used. Ambient temperature varies between 68 to 86 degrees Fahrenheit.

The air conditioning test raises ambient temperatures to 95 degrees Fahrenheit, and the vehicle's climate control system is put to use. Lasting 9.9 minutes, the 3.6 mile loop averages 22 mph and maximizes at a rate of 54.8 mph. Five stops are included, idling occurs 19 percent of the time and acceleration of 5.1 mph/sec is achieved. Engine temperatures begin warm. Lastly, a cold temperature cycle uses the same parameters as the current city loop, except that ambient temperature is set to 20 degrees Fahrenheit.

CAFE standards The Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations in the United States, first enacted by Congress in 1975, are federal regulations intended to improve the average fuel economy of cars and light trucks (trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles) sold in the US in the wake of the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo. Historically, it is the sales-weighted average fuel economy of a manufacturer's Fleet vehicle of current model year passenger cars or light trucks, manufactured for sale in the United States. Under Truck CAFE standards 2008–2011 this changes to a "footprint" model where larger trucks are allowed to consume more fuel. The standards are limited to vehicles under a certain weight, but those weight classes will be expanding in 2011 if current law (as of April 2006) holds.

Energy considerations Ideally, a car traveling at a constant velocity and constant grade in a vacuum with frictionless wheels could travel at any speed without consuming any energy beyond what is needed to get the car up to speed. With ideal regenerative braking, this energy could be completely recovered. In real-world conditions, energy is lost in a number of ways:

• Engine efficiency, which varies with engine type, the mass of the automobile and its load, and engine speed (usually measured in Revolutions per minute).
• Aerodynamic drag, which increases roughly by the square of the car's speed.
• Rolling friction.
• Braking, although regenerative braking captures some of the energy that would otherwise be lost.
• Losses in the Transmission (mechanics). (Manual transmissions can be up to 94% efficient whereas older automatic transmissions may be as low as 70% efficient.http://www.sae.org/servlets/productDetail?PROD_TYP=PAPER&PROD_CD=1999-01-1259)
• Air conditioning. Parasitic losses due to the necessary power required for the engine to turn the compressor additionally decrease fuel mileage, though only when in use. Headlights, media systems, and other electronics can also increase fuel consumption, as the energy to power these devices comes from the charging system, increasing the load on the alternator.

Fuel economy-boosting technologies

• Reducing vehicle weight by using materials such as aluminum, fiberglass, plastic, HSLA steel and carbon fiber instead of steel and iron
• Designing the exterior of the vehicle to reduce aerodynamic Drag (physics)
• Using lower-viscosity lubricants (motor oil, transmission fluid, axle fluid)
• Incorporating Torque converter#Lock-up torque converters in automatic transmissions to reduce slip and power losses in the converter
• Augmenting a downsized engine with an electric drive system and battery (hybrid vehicles) hybrid electric vehicle

• Automatically shutting off engine when vehicle is stopped (Mild Hybrid)
• Recapturing wasted energy while braking (regenerative braking)
• Optimizing other engine combustion strategies:
• Stratified charge engine combustion
• Lean burn combustion
• HCCI combustion
• Variable valve timing
• Supercharger or Twincharger (when coupled with a downsized engine)

Aftermarket fuel economy device exist which are purported to increase fuel economy; many of these claims have been discredited.

Fuel economy data reliability The mandatory publication of the fuel consumption by the manufacturer has led to a doubtful practice to reach better values. Those consist of measure the users may imitate but others which are dangerous if used in road traffic or may increase maintenance costs. The measures in detail:

• selection of high quality vehicles from the production
• use of special expensive lubricants
• increase tire pressure above feasible thresholds
• disable energy consumers and start with a loaded battery
• turn the outer mirror(s) in-line with the wind
• correct the alignment of the wheels

If the test is on a test stand, the vehicle may detect open doors and adapt the engine control. Also when driven according to the test regime, the parameters may adapt automatically.This is summarized under the term "golden car" which is used to produce better mileage figures.

Fuel economy maximizing behaviors Governments, various environmentalist organizations, and companies like Toyota and Shell Oil Company have historically urged customers and citizens to maintain adequate air pressure in tires and careful acceleration/deceleration habits. These concepts are marketing through the use of terms like hypermiler, ecodriving, and Nempimania.

References

See also

• ACEA agreement
• Car_tuning
• Battery electric vehicle
• Emission standard
• Energy conservation
• Fuel_economy-maximizing_behaviors
• Fuel efficiency in transportation
• Vehicle Efficiency Initiative

External links

• U.S. Fuel Economy Label (EPA).
• US EPA Green Vehicle Guide.
• How EPA Fuel-Economy Testing Works
• US government's FuelEconomy.gov
• Canadian Energuide: Vehicles
• Green Vehicle Guide Australia
• UK Car Fuel Data
• European Community Directive 93/116/EC — European Commission Directive 93/116/EC of 17.12.1993 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 80/1268/EEC relating to the fuel consumption of motor vehicles
• Earthcars: EPA fuel economy ratings - what's coming in 2008